• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

this will make your day

george68hemirr

I think you guys are full of shit.
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
12,645
Reaction score
69
Location
hudson valley ny
THIS MAY MAKE YOUR DAY!

Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the
U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very
carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping
some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere.

Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and
require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would
become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about
unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun.

Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only
the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate
to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the
Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by
the government as well as criminals. Vermont's constitution states
explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of
themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously
scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent.."

Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to
arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation
that may arise."

Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required
to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's
license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government
interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they
be asked to do so," Maslack says

Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the
least restrictive laws of any state .. it's currently the only state
that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit.
This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has
resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation.

"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the
system, but too early to shoot the bastards."

This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay
taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns.
Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.




Sounds reasonable to me! :D
 

george68hemirr

I think you guys are full of shit.
Joined
Jan 23, 2009
Messages
12,645
Reaction score
69
Location
hudson valley ny
it makes total sense.....everybody should be armed.....we would have these nut cases shooting everybody if they were carrying :D
 

69hemibeep

Sponge Bob Square Wheels
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
22,217
Reaction score
2,456
Location
AZ Desert,
I always say be careful what you ask for, the courts may rule in a different direction. Remember its an interpretation, also in AZ you can carry concealed without a permit but that just passed probably long after this was posted on the net.
 

sixgunrunner68

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
3,027
Reaction score
12
Location
Hudson Valley (aka Safe Zone), New York
I like the idea of advocating gun ownership. That being said though, I definitely feel that permits should be required to carry. It's a pain in the ass I know, believe me, living in NY I had to jump throug hoops and wait for nine months before mine was issued. But you have to do the background checks. :cents:
 
Back
Top